You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of utility outcomes for included studies

From: Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: a systematic review of validity and responsiveness

Study referenceCondition(s) of interestRespondent typePBM (s)Other relevant outcome measuresOverall utility scores (mean ± SD)Sub-group utility scores (mean ± SD)
Bartlett et al. (2010) [33]Adolescents with cerebral palsyProxy (parent)HUI3Gross Motor Function Measure 66 Items (GMFM-66)
Spinal Alignment and Range of Motion Measure (SAROMM)
NA
Overall utility scores not reported, only vision, cognition and pain dimensions used - ambulation, hearing, speech, dexterity and emotion dimensions all excluded due to conceptual overlap with other measures
NA
Bray et al. (2017) [15]Children and adolescents with impaired mobility (relevant conditions: cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, muscular dystrophy)Self-reported and proxy (parent); matched-pairsHUI2, HUI3 and EQ-5D-YVisual analogue scale (VAS)Child self-reported
HUI2: 0.53 (±0.07)
HUI3: 0.22 (±0.09)
EQ-5D-Y: 0.24 (±0.30)
Parent proxy
HUI2: 0.49 (±0.09)
HUI3: 0.16 (±0.10)
EQ-5D-Y: 0.01 (±0.14)
NA
Burstrom et al. (2014) [11]Children and adolescents with functional motor, orthopaedic and medical disabilities (relevant conditions: artrogryposis multiple congenital, myelomeningocele, cerebral palsy, orthopaedic lower limb deformities, achondroplasia)Self-reportedEQ-5D-YVAS
KIDSCREEN-27
KIDSCREEN-10
Self-rated health (SRH)
Life satisfaction ladder (LSL)
NA
Overall utility scores not reported, only dimension scores reported
NA
Cavazza et al. (2016) [34]Adolescents and adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophySelf-reportedEQ-5D-YVAS
Barthel Index
Mean 0.24
Varied by country, ranging from − 0.71 (±0.41) in Sweden to 0.66 (±0.08) in Bulgaria
NA
Christensen et al. (2016) [35]Children and adolescents with cerebral palsyProxy (caregiver)HUI3Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating ScaleNA
Overall utility scores not reported, only HUI3 pain dimension measured
NA
Findlay et al. (2015) [36]Children with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); proportion of proxy data not reportedHUI3DISABKIDS Chronic Generic module (DCGM-37)
DISABKIDS Smiley measure (DSM)
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
NA
Overall utility scores not reported, only HUI3 pain dimension measured
NA
Hendriksz et al. (2014) [37]Children and adults with Morquio A syndromeSelf-reportedEQ-5D-5 LBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool (APPT)
NA
Overall utility scores not reported
Child group: utility score by wheelchair use frequency
No use: 0.534
Occasional use: 0.664
Full-time use: − 0.180
Adult group: utility score by wheelchair use frequency
No use: 0.846
Occasional use: 0.582
Full-time use: 0.057
Karmur and Kulkarni (2018) [38]Children and adolescents with spina bifida (myelomeningocele) and shunted hydrocephalusProxy (caregiver)HUI2 and HUI3 (version used to calculate utility scores not stated)Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire (HOQ)0.51 (±0.28)NA
Kennes et al. (2002) [39]Children with cerebral palsyProxy (caregiver)HUI3Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM)
Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)
NA
Overall utility scores not reported, only dimension scores reported
NA
Kulkarni et al. (2004) [40]Children with hydrocephalusProxy (parent)HUI2HOQNA
Overall utility scores not reported
NA
Kulkarni et al. (2006) [41]Children with hydrocephalusProxy (parent)HUI2HOQNA
Overall utility scores not reported
NA
Kulkarni et al. (2008) [42]Children with hydrocephalusProxy (caregiver)HUI3HOQ0.58 (±0.32)NA
Kulkarni et al. (2008) [43]Children with hydrocephalusSelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); proxy-reported HUI3 and HOQ, self-reported cHOQHUI3Child-completed version of the HOQ (cHOQ)0.71 (±0.27)NA
Landfeldt et al. (2016) [44]Children and adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophyProxy (caregiver); although patients included in data collection, only proxy utility data reportedHUI (version not stated)Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) neuromuscular module 3.0NA
Overall utility scores not reported
Utility score by ambulatory status
Early ambulatory: 0.75
Late non-ambulatory: 0.15
Lindquist et al. (2014) [45]Adults who experienced hydrocephalus in infancySelf-reported15DNAStudy group: 0.92Control group: 0.95
Livingston and Rosenbaum (2008) [46]Adolescents with cerebral palsyProxy (parent)HUI3Quality of Life Instrument for People with Developmental Disabilities (QOL Instrument)NA
Overall utility scores not reported
NA
Lopez-Bastida et al. (2017) [47]Children with spinal muscular atrophyProxy (caregiver)EQ-5D-3 LVAS
Barthel Index
0.16 (±0.44)Utility score by spinal muscular atrophy type
Type II spinal muscular atrophy sub-group: − 0.01 (±0.35)
Scores for Type I and III not reported
Morrow et al. (2011) [48]Children with chronic conditions (relevant condition: cerebral palsy)Self-reported and proxy (parent and doctor); matched groupsHUI2 and HUI3NANA
Overall utility scores not reported for relevant sub-group
NA
Penner et al. (2013) [49]Children and adolescents with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (parent and physician); proxy-reported HUI3 pain score, self-reported Wong-Baker FACES Pain ScaleHUI3Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating ScaleNA
Overall utility scores not reported, only HUI3 pain dimension measured
NA
Perez Sousa et al. (2017) [50]Children and adolescents with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (mother and father); matched groupsEQ-5D-YVASNA
Overall utility scores not reported, only dimension scores reported
NA
Petrou and Kupek (2009) [51]Children with childhood conditions (relevant conditions: microcephaly, cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular dystrophy, spina bifida)Proxy (caregiver)HUI3NAMean utility by condition
Microcephaly: 0.141
Cerebral palsy: 0.276
Muscular dystrophy or spinal muscular atrophy: 0.386
Spina bifida: 0.452
NA
Rocque et al. (2015) [52]Children and adolescents with spina bifidaSelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); predominantly proxy (11% self-reported)HUI3NANA
Overall utility scores not reported
Utility score by type of spina bifida
Myelomeningocele: 0.51
Closed spinal dysraphism: 0.77
Utility score by treatment history
No history of shunt or CM-II decompression: 0.74
Shunt but no CM-II decompression: 0.49
Shunt and CM-II decompression: 0.29
Rosenbaum et al. (2007) [53]Adolescents with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (parent); proxy-reported HUI3, 34% self-reported QOL InstrumentHUI3QOL Instrument0.42 (±0.41)Utility score by GMFCS level
GMFCS I: 0.84 (±0.20)
GMFCS II: 0.50 (±0.31)
GMFCS III: 0.39 (±0.31)
GMFCS IV: 0.16 (±0.26)
GMFCS V: − 0.08 (±0.23)
Sims-Williams et al. (2017) [54]Children with spina bifidaSelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); matched pairsHUI3VASChild self-reported
0.58 (95% CI 0.49–0.66)
Caregiver proxy
0.55 (95% CI 0.47–0.63)
NA
Slaman et al. (2015) [55]Adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsySelf-reportedSF-6D36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) - SF-6D utility outcomes derived from SF-36Baseline
Control: 0.74 (±0.12)
Intervention: 0.75 (±0.10)
6 months post intervention
Control: 0.77 (±0.12)
Intervention: 0.80 (±0.03)
NA
Tilford et al. (2005) [56]Children with spina bifidaProxy (caregiver)HUI2Quality of Well-Being scale (QWB)Case group: 0.55 (±0.24)Utility by case group lesion level
Sacral lesion: 0.61 (±0.26)
Lower lumbar lesion: 0.54 (±0.19)
Thoracic lesion: 0.45 (±0.25)
General population control group: 0.93 (±0.11)
Usuba et al. (2014) [57]Adolescents and adults with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (undefined); predominantly proxy (40% self-reported)HUI3 and AQoLSRHBaseline (both groups)
HUI3: 0.29 (±0.39)
AQoL: 0.35 (±0.33)
8-year follow-up (both groups)
HUI3: 0.29 (±0.38)
AQoL: 0.35 (±0.32)
NA
Vitale et al. (2001) [58]Adolescents with orthopaedic problems (relevant condition: cerebral palsy)Self-reportedEQ-5D (version not stated)SF-36Cerebral palsy sub-group: 0.922NA
Wallander et al. (2009) [59]Adults treated for CTEV in infancySelf-reportedEQ-5D (version not stated)SF-36
VAS
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire
NA
Overall utility scores not reported
NA
Young et al. (2010) [22]Adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsySelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); predominantly self-reported (45% proxy)HUI3 and AQoLSRH
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Combined age groups
HUI3: 0.30 (±0.42)
AQoL: 0.28 (±0.33)
Utility score by age group (HUI3 / AQoL)
‘Youth’ group: 0.30 (±0.43) / 0.28 (±0.34)
‘Adult’ group: 0.31 (±0.40) / 0.28 (±0.314)
Youth group: utility score by GMFCS level (HUI3 / AQoL)
GMFCS I: 0.67 (±0.32) / 0.58 (±0.31)
GMFCS II: 0.59 (±0.35) / 0.53 (±0.34)
GMFCS III: 0.43 (±0.39) / 0.31 (±0.32)
GMFCS IV: 0.08 (±0.25) / 0.06 (±0.12)
GMFCS V: − 0.13 (±0.19) / 0.01 (±0.07)
Adult group: utility score by GMFCS level (HUI3 / AQoL)GMFCS I: 0.64 (±0.30) / 0.52 (±0.32)
GMFCS II: 0.50 (±0.39) / 0.33 (±0.24)
GMFCS III: 0.53 (±0.27) / 0.39 (±0.27)
GMFCS IV: 0.06 (±0.21) / 0.10 (±0.20)
GMFCS V: − 0.14 (±0.20) / 0.02 (±0.06)
Young et al. (2013) [21]Adolescents and young adults with spina bifidaSelf-reported and proxy (caregiver); predominantly self-reported (15% proxy)HUI3 and AQoLSRHHAQCombined age groups
HUI3: 0.52 (±0.28)
AQoL: 0.34 (±0.24)
Utility score by age group (HUI3 / AQoL)
‘Youth’ group: 0.58 (±0.27) / 0.37 (±0.26)
‘Adult’ group: 0.36 (±0.27) / 0.25 (±0.17)
Utility score by lesion level (HUI3 / AQoL)
Thoracic: 0.29 (±0.14) / 0.22 (±0.14)
High-lumbar: 0.44 (±0.31) / 0.28 (±0.23)
Low-lumbar: 0.63 (±0.23) / 0.39 (±0.21)
Sacral: 0.76 (±0.20) / 0.51 (±0.33)
Unknown: 0.22 (±0.02) / 0.09 (±0.04)