You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of model analysis (deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis)

From: Real-world cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on patient chart review in the Netherlands

  LY (95% CI) QALY (95% CI) Cost, € (95% CI)
Deterministic analysis (undiscounted)
 Cetuximab + BSC 0.61 0.48 37,146
 BSC 0.32 0.24 3678
 Incremental 0.29 0.25 33,468
 ICER 115,690 134,495  
Deterministic analysis (discounted)
 Cetuximab + BSC 0.61 0.48 36,637
 BSC 0.32 0.23 3648
 Incremental 0.29 0.25 32,989
 ICER 114,907 133,527  
PSA (undiscounted)
 Cetuximab + BSC 0.61 (0.57–0.64) 0.48 (0.45–0.51) 36,915 (26,773–48,716)
 BSC 0.32 (0.30–0.34) 0.24 (0.22–0.25) 3639 (2520–4982)
 Incremental 0.29 (0.25–0.33) 0.25 (0.21–0.28) 33,276 (22,720–45,027)
 ICER 116,030 (80,417–158,009) 134,777 (92,521–184,072)  
PSA (discounted)
 Cetuximab + BSC 0.61 (057–0.64) 0.48 (0.45–0.51) 36,410 (26,407–48,053)
 BSC 0.32 (0.30–0.34) 0.24 (0.22–0.25) 3609 (2498–4942)
 Incremental 0.29 (0.24–0.33) 0.25 (0.21–0.28) 32,801 (22,394–44,397)
 ICER 115,248 (79,861–156,946) 133,812 (92,521–184,072)  
  1. BSC best supportive care, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, LY life-year, PSA probabilistic sensitivity analysis, QALY quality-adjusted life-year